Kait Cantleyadded a comment 9 years ago
Technically, it makes the most sense with only three had's ;)
Go to Questions & Answers
Sergey Kudinovadded a note 9 years ago
note (ru-en)
Четыре одинаковых слова подряд - круто!
Crazy English :-)
12
Discussion (5)
Nicolas Cheplaginadded a comment 9 years ago
Could someone please explain a neсessity of fourth had?
Igor Yurchenkoadded a comment 9 years ago
Just so that there would be four of them, maybe?
Holy Molyadded a comment 9 years ago
Kait, actually no ;)
Nick, the first and third "hads" are auxiliary verbs :)
Sergey Kudinovadded a comment 9 years ago
Agreed with Olga! ;-)